untitled (4).jpg

Abortion bans in select U.S. states are now impacting healthcare opportunities within Pennsylvania.

Abortion remains legal in Pennsylvania, but states bordering western Pennsylvania have put in place restrictions, leading many to seek abortion care in Pennsylvania.

During a recent joint hearing involving the PA House and Senate Democratic Policy committees at Chatham University, testifiers explained the healthcare challenges the state now faces as a result of the Supreme Court decision.

The hearing featured testimony from medical and legal professionals, as well as reproductive health care advocates.

The Women’s Health Caucus called for a series of hearings to discuss a post-Roe Pennsylvania and hear from providers and experts on how Pennsylvania’s health care providers are affected by law changes.  

“Today’s hearing continued to shine a light on the alarming fallout health care providers and individuals are facing across the nation since the June 24 ruling by the Supreme Court wiped out almost 50 years of precedent – not to mention the ability to receive vital life-saving care,” state Sen. Katie Muth said. “As someone who grew up in western Pennsylvania, it’s disturbing to hear that clinics in Pennsylvania are now seeing an influx of two to three times the number of patients because of restrictive laws in neighboring states, which in turn delays access for Pennsylvania residents.”  

Before the overturning of Roe. V. Wade, Dr. Sheila Ramgopal, the CEO of independent Allegheny Reproductive Health Center, said about 30% of her patients came from out of state.

Since the overturning of Roe v. Wade and abortion restrictions in neighboring states have been signed into law, her center has seen a considerable increase of patients from out of state: she estimates her center is seeing between 60% to 70% of out-of-state patients.  

“Everyone is tired,” Ramgopal said, “and not just physically, we are emotionally and spiritually tired. We are experiencing empathy overload. People are calling us and trying to figure out how to get to us, and we are hearing so many desperate stories.” 

State Rep. Mary Isaacson questioned testifiers to learn how rape exceptions would work, and health care providers noted the many difficulties of making that a reality after abortion has been restricted. Testifiers noted they have cared for patients for months before patients reveal they have been sexually assaulted. Sen. Muth, who has revealed she is a rape survivor, noted she “did not tell a soul” for eight years.   

“As we heard today, and as we heard throughout this series of hearings, there’s no easy answers when it comes to restricting abortion,” Isaacson said. “If abortion is restricted, the education throughout our state for health care professionals changes and alters their experience in performing lifesaving procedures – putting our residents’ lives at risk.” 

Sue Frietsche, who is the senior staff attorney at the Women’s Law Project, noted the overturning of Roe also created myriad legal questions, problems and issues—including out-of-state residents receiving care in Pennsylvania and returning to a state with restrictive laws.  

“People are saying we are going back to before Roe,” Frietsche said. “That’s not correct. We are in a place where we have never been before. … The confusion and fog around the legality about abortion is hurting people.” 

Keep your news local

Access to independent, local news is important, do you agree?

We work hard to deliver timely, relevant news, for free. 100% of your contribution to NorthcentralPa.com goes directly to helping us cover news and events in the region.

Thank you for saying that local news matters!